The report was requested to help prepare Bush for his trip to Europe
next week, but the academy was not asked for policy recommendations
and it made none.
However, White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said the report
does not definitely conclude that human activity is the cause of
rising temperatures.
``Yes, temperatures (are) rising. It is uncertain what has caused
it and what the solutions might be,'' he said.
Bush wanted the study to help the administration decide what steps
to take to combat climate change.
In Europe, Bush has meetings on global warming scheduled with various
officials. Many Europeans protested vigorously after Bush, citing
looming energy shortages, in March reversed a campaign promise to
limit CO2 emissions from power plants.
Bush's Cabinet-level task force plans to keep studying the issue
after the president goes to Europe, where he is expected to outline
a set of mostly voluntary steps that countries could take to reduce
emissions.
The 24-page National Academy of Sciences report, an assessment
based on previous studies of the phenomenon, says, ``The primary
source, fossil fuel burning, has released roughly twice as much
carbon dioxide as would be required to account for the observed
increase'' in temperature.
The report also blames global warming on other greenhouse gases
directly affected by human activity: methane, ozone, nitrous oxide
and chlorofluorocarbons.
``Despite the uncertainties, there is general agreement that the
observed warming is real and particularly strong within the past
20 years,'' it says. ``Global warming could well have serious adverse
societal and ecological impacts by the end of this century.''
One U.S. area likely to be hard hit by climate change is the United
States' breadbasket, the Great Plains.
Two senior Bush advisers, John Bridgeland, who oversees domestic
policy, and Gary Edson, an economist, wrote to the academy May 11
asking for help with ``identifying the areas in the science of climate
change where there are the greatest certainties and uncertainties.''
In preparation for his round of meetings with European allies,
Bush held a lengthy meeting with Cabinet members Tuesday to come
up with a strategy on how to sell his almost-finished proposal for
a global-warming agreement, according to senior administration officials.
In March, he rejected an international pact former Vice President
Al Gore signed in Kyoto, Japan, that would have set tight limits
on emissions of many greenhouse gases.
Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., said the academy report was unnecessary
and ``underscores the lack of leadership'' by Bush on global warming.
``The science on this has been strong enough that presidents and
foreign ministers of other countries have moved on this for years,''
Kerry said.
But now that the report is in hand, he said, ``It increases the
imperative for them to take action.''
Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., a major participant in the debate on
global warming, said the report ``provides us with a basis to move
forward with an alternative'' global warming strategy.
Though the report is neutral on that, scientists ``really do know
that CO2 is the main driver'' behind global warming, said the report's
lead author, Ralph Cicerone, chancellor of the University of California,
Irvine.
Prepared in less than a month by 11 scientists, the report finds
agreement with the assessment of human-caused climate change by
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an agency of the
United Nations.
``The IPCC's conclusion that most of the observed warming of the
last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse
gas concentrations accurately reflects the current thinking of the
scientific community on this issue,'' the report says.
It says, however, the increase of global fossil fuel carbon dioxide
emissions in the past decade has averaged about 0.6 percent per
year, less than the range of IPCC scenarios.
Other findings are:
By 2100, temperatures are expected to increase between 2.5 degrees
and 10.4 degrees Fahrenheit above those of 1990.
The predicted warming is larger over higher latitudes than over
low latitudes, especially during winter and spring, and larger over
land than over the oceans.
Rainfall rates and the frequency of heavy precipitation events
are predicted to increase, particularly over the higher latitudes.
``The likelihood that this effect could prove important is greatest
in semiarid regions, such as the U.S. Great Plains,'' the report
says.
On the Net:
National Academy: http://www.nationalacademies.org
United Nations: http://www.ipcc.ch
EPA global warming: http://www.epa.gov/globalwarming
Back To Global-Warming.net